Friday, December 5, 2008
Liars' Club Review
The Liars’ Club is described as," A classic of American literature.... Mary Karr conjures the simmering heat and bottled rage of life in a small Texas oil town with an intensity that gains power from the fact that it's fact. " — James Atlas, The New York Times Magazine
The Liars’ Club was written in 1995 based on the life of author Mary Karr. She writes a compelling and riveting memoir with various topics which many authors find hard to write. Mary left nothing untold, even though at times when reading, one can tell Karr became hesitant in telling her story. Time magazine sums it up greatly when said,“Mary Karr’s God-awful childhood has a calamitous appeal. The choice in the book is between howling misery and howling laughter, and the reader veers toward laughter. Karr has survived to write a drop-dead reply to the question, ‘Ma, what was it like when you were a little girl?”.
The Liars’ Club is a memoir written by Mary Karr. The book begins with a partial description of a night in 1961 in Leechfield, Texas. This small oil town in East Texas, near the Gulf of Mexico, is where Mary, her father, mother, and sister live. On the night in question there is quite a commotion taking place. Mary’s mother has been taken away, for what we do not know, and her father is nowhere to be found. Meanwhile, a doctor is asking the very young Mary to show him the marks, but Mary has no marks on her body to speak of. The two young girls are then taken out of the house by the sherrif and we the readers, are left wondering… what is going on?
As this memoir progresses we become acquainted with “The Lairs Club”, the nickname title given to Mary’s father and his friends who meet somewhat infrequently at a bar or in the back of a bait shop.
At these meetings, Mary’s father tells the others fantastic and astounding stories about his life that seem to be bordering on the untruthful side. Mary is the only child to ever be present at these meetings.
We learn too, that Mary’s mother, a college educated daughter of cotton farmers, has been married seven times throughout the course of her life, Mary’s father being marriage number four. At one point Mary’s mother and father get into a larger fight than is customary for their home, and Mary’s mother takes Mary and her sister Lecia to their Grandma Moore’s house. It is here that we are introduced to this rather odd character, who never seems to be short on advice or criticism.
Later in the memoir, Grandma Moore is diagnosed with cancer and comes to live with the family. She changes the way the family does everything, and to Mary, her mother becomes a figment of her once vibrant self. During all of this Mary’s father stays away from home so as to not upset the not so delicate balance of sanity in the house (Grandma Moore harbors a deep distain for him). The cancer eventually catches up with Grandma Moore and she first goes into a coma, after apparently attempting suicide during hurricane Carla.
Throughout all of these episodes we can see the steady decline of Mary’s mother’s mental stability. When Grandma Moore finally does die, we see her psychic health chip away that much more. And eventually Mary’s mother plunges off the deep end when she receives news of the inheritance she is set to receive from her mother’s estate. We never really learn the sum of the estate, but it is clear that it is probably a good deal more than $100,000. It is at this point that Mary’s mother snaps, going through the house, scrawling lipstick all over mirrors, and shattering them when she is out of lipstick. She burns all of the mail that came in that day. Then, without warning, she rounds up all of the girls’ things, clothes, toys, etc. and proceeds to toss them into a bonfire in the back yard.
She then grabs a knife and heads for the girls’ bedroom, and seeing them lying under a sheet completely covered, calls the doctor and tells him that she has stabbed and killed her two daughters. However, the girls are alive. This is the episode that the beginning of the memoir neglected to describe in full detail.
After Mary’s mother is released from the mental hospital, the family embarks on a trip to the Seattle World’s Fare, but they never each their destination. Instead, while making a stop in Colorado, Mary’s mother, on an impulse, decides to buy a house in a random mountain town near Pike’s Peak. The parent’s get divorced, and Mary’s mother gets remarried, again, this is number five, to a man she meats in the local bar.
In the last section of this compelling story, it is shown how the relationship between Mary, Lecia and their father has shifted. Since he is now not presently living with them, as the southern gentlemen tend to do after divorce, left his children alone. It is around Father’s Day and the girls attempted to call him and were not able to get through, so they begin to make cards for him to send. Hector, their new step-father, had mentioned he would like if they would make him Father’s Day cards, but the reactions and action of the girls show they still do not consider him any father figure and hope their father will begin making contact soon. They refuse to give up hope. The next morning, their mother takes them to the post office to send the Father’s Day cards and we show how their mother is still not mentally stable. She has now turned to alcohol and pills. Mary said, “She’d brought a Bloody Mary in a tumbler with a lid on it, like a baby would sip out of” then continues and says, “I saw for the first time how drinking had worn away her looks”. This shows how her mother is slowly sipping away. She is definitely a new person from in the past, yet still not “all there”.
The memoir follows with Mary’s mother moving the family to a town named Antelope. There they rent a house and the girls begin a new school with Mary feeling lonely and friendless, she eventually gets into a fight. After the fight, her initial thought was “Daddy would have been proud of that eye”. It is interesting to see that even though her father is not present, she still has that lingering feeling of trying to impress him and it shows how she still wants that relationship with him back.
Towards the end of the memoir, Mary begins to reveal to us what she wouldn’t share in the beginning. We find out that as a child, she was molested by her male babysitter. It goes to describe, as she remembers, details of that night and how he got her to do what she does. It is interesting because when Mary describes heart breaking or bad times or experiences in her life, she uses her humor to divert us from thinking it is as bad as it sounds. She tells of times she remembers in her past and she tends to ramble on before actually hitting the point. For example, during the revealing of her molestation, she begins talking about Christian soldiers and how they should come and “lop his pecker off”. She adds bits of witticism in her writing to somewhat alleviate the seriousness.
After Mary reveals the story of her molestation, it goes to show again, her mother not mentally stable when she threatens to shoot Hector, her husband at the time. After returning home from a drunken night at the bar, Hector, already a little upset from stories told earlier in the night, gets mad and calls Lecia a bitch, which sets something off in their mother. She proceeds to aim a gun at Hector while he is sitting on the couch.
Mary decides to fling herself over him because she knew her mother would not shoot her. As she keeps on telling the events of that night, bits of humor are kicked in and she talks about when she looked around “the whole scene had struck me as goofy”. The night of chaos ends with Mary running to get her principle and the family acts “normal” as soon as he knocks on the door with Mary.
The next day, Lecia and Mary call their father and demand he send for them. After staying with their father for a while, their mother and Hector come back for some dresses when a fight between Hector and their father begins after Hector told their mother to “get her ass in gear”. That night, Mary’s mother took Hector to the hospital, checked out of their hotel room and returned to her family. Mary said, “She stayed with Daddy till his death, stayed well into her own dotage”.
The memoir forwards to 17 years into the future beginning with Mary’s dad having a stroke while sitting at the American Legion. The story ends with Mary’s relationship with her father becoming better, slowly. She took care of him constantly with her mother and in the beginning, it was a bit hard, but her father became happy towards the end of his life. It is interesting that Mary’s relationship with her father came full circle, back to those days with the Liars’ Club. Even some of the guys from the club came and spent time with her father.
The relationship with Mary and her mother improved greatly as well. While in the attic one day, Mary discovered wedding rings and had remembered her Grandma Moore showing her a picture of two young children. She confronted her mother about it and found out they were half siblings. Her mother and her were able to connect and realized how important family was to them. The relationship with Mary and her parents became quite touching and even though it was such a compelling story, Mary was still able to douse some humor in her writing of this memoir, talking about how her dad “cooed like a baby” when she lifted him into his wheelchair. We as readers are able to feel for Mary and connect to her and the relationships with members in our own families, in one form or another.
Group Members: Dana Heileman and Jonathan Fessel
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Humor and Politics
It seems in our culture today that we focus endlessly on politicians as the butt of jokes. We all know they make it extremely easy through the affairs with prostitutes, bad grammar, and poor political choices. The families of the politicians are sometimes affected. There is great humility involved. One reason why we pick them as the object of our humor may be that behind all of their political fakeness, they really are people. It seems sometimes through all of the campaigning that it is hard to imagine them as human. This makes it easy to forget that they make mistakes just like the rest of us. Many of these jokes can be seen late night on television. SNL, Jay Leno, and The Colbert Report are a few examples that everyone knows will make fun of any political event that comes our way. It is a way for society to point out that the politicians are, more often than not, terrible role models. America loves to point out all of the absurdities that are presented to us through politics.
We have seen politics and humor together in class through the literature and the theorists.
Politics and Humor Theorists Approach
Sigmund Freud’s definition of humor and jokes allows us to form a basic framework for why the political can seem humorous. Jokes on political subjects are generally of a tendentious nature. This means that they serve an aim or purpose for the teller of the joke. Cynical jokes are jokes directed at an institution. We make jokes about the political because the only way we can make fun of the political through humor. Using humor to mock institutions allows us to evade restrictions that society would normally place on us.
In a slightly different twist, Thomas Hobbes defined humor as egotistical mechanism that fit perfectly in line with his theory that man always acts out of self-love. Laughter is a way of expressing power over another. “Laughter is self-applause” where I laugh when “I can see the point and thus appreciate my superiority” (Ewin 30). In this way, we use humor to feel power over political figures that would normally have a large advantage over us. We feel a fleeting superiority over those who we laugh at. “Joy, arising from imagination of mans own power and ability, is that exultation of the mind” which causes one to feel a sense of security (Hobbes 42).
Henri Bergson claimed that humor intends to humiliate. This humiliation, “snubbing,” works as a social corrective. In this way, when a politician steps out of line, we collectively humiliate that person to try to bring them back into the fold of normalcy. Additionally, Bergson claims that laughter is purely cerebral. “Its appeal is to intelligence, pure and simple” (Bergson 2). In order to laugh at a situation, one must be emotionally detached. This is how we can find humor in situations that involve conflict where laughter might, at first, seem inappropriate.
The Effect of Living Backwards
The use of politics and humor can be seen in literary works such as The Effect of Living Backwards, by Heidi Julavits. Even though the story mainly revolves around the relationship between two sisters, there is a part of the book that involves the hijacking of an airplane. The hijacking by two terrorists is mentioned by the author in comparison to “The Big Terrible”. Many readers would relate such an instance to the traumatic political event of 9-11. Julavits started writing The Effect of Living Backwards before September 11th, and for that reason, had to make several changes in her story after the event. Julavits still chose to keep the hijacking scene in her story although she had to be especially sensitive to mentioning a terrorist attack in her book. Therefore, it is not irrational to believe there is significance in Julavits portraying a terrorist attack in her story in order to convey a message to her readers. Julavits used the idea of terrorism as a metaphor for the relationship between two sisters. Not until after their own “Big Terrible” do the sisters find a greater appreciation for each other and also search for a deeper meaning of who they are. These ideas are strongly related to the feelings of U.S. citizens after the terrorist attack of September 11th. During a time of crisis, our country’s people were focusing on what is most important in life, such as family and friends, and searching for answers as to why things happen. Just as the hijacking made the relationship of the sisters stronger, the event of 9-11 made the United States stronger. In some ways, Julavits was using a catastrophic political event in order to convey a deeper message that many of her readers could relate to from their own experiences with 9-11.
Carnivore Diet
Another comical literary piece which vaguely mentions political elements is in Carnivore Diet by Julia Slavin. The father in the story was involved in politics and was sentenced to three years in jail because of illegitimate actions during his time in Congress. There was political controversy in the story, and it appeared the father was set up in a scandal. Other characters involved with politics were portrayed as being deceitful individuals. Also the political controversy in this story affected the families, and caused problems as information was spread throughout the suburban community. The wife and the son of the man who was imprisoned had to deal with negative social pressures in their neighborhood caused from the political mishap. Readers could see the affects of political controversy in the lives of politics and their families.
Willful Creatures: Dog Days
Another example of politics and humor is in the short story, “Dog Days”, by Aimee Bender, in which readers can see the effects of a war on a society. The story is about a real man who acts like a dog, and is ultimately treated like a real pet dog by a middle-class American. However, it is mentioned that a war is going on and the economy is falling apart. People in the neighborhood are disappearing and resources become more and more scarce. The family who has taken in the “dog” actually ends up killing it in the end because of their need for food as a means of survival. The fact that a war was going on and the society was falling apart drove the dad of the family to an outrageous behavior of killing a man and justifying his action by stating he was just an animal. The author’s intentions may have been to use absurdist humor show the potential for how outlandish people in societies can act during extreme difficulties such as political events like war.
In several literary pieces we have read this quarter, authors vaguely mention political elements in their writings. This is not merely an unintentional occurrence but rather a method to convey deeper messages relating to today’s political matters. Politics have a large impact on the way in which our society functions and writers use political elements to relate readers and their societies through the context of humor. Many of the literary works which are known for their use of humor are not created solely for laughs and entertainment but the stories are meant to communicate a hidden and deeper meaning. This allows writers to indirectly get their points across about political affairs and various issues that are left for the reader to unfold.
Overall, the use of satire in politics is a useful and popular method in today's society. We are surrounded with such humor, whether it is seen in different publications, like books and news articles, or through the media. Some television shows make millions of dollars off the humor that many Americans find in political humor. This humor can be used to convey both comical and serious messages. Also this specific humor can be related to philosophers and their theories of why humor is used. In most cases, political humor is simply a way for Americans to express their beliefs freely to others about political matters.
Lauren, Jeremy, and Brittany
Works Cited:
Bender, Aimee. Willful Creatures. New York: Anchor Books, 2005.
Bergson, Henri. Laughter: an Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. Not copyrighted.
Ewin, R. E. “Hobbes on Laughter.” The Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 51, No. 202 (Jan., 2001): 29-40. Jstor. 10 May 2008.
Hobbes, Thomas. The Leviathan. England: 1651.
Julavits, Heidi. The Effect of Living Backwards. New York: Berkley Books, 2003.
Slavin, Julia. Carnivore Diet. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2005.
Humor and Heart Break:
From the start you can see that there is something missing from Bruno, not just his eyesight. He is cynical and almost bitter in a sense. You hear him tell stories of how he lost his eyesight to the hostages but it isn't until his "Shame Story" that you find out the truth. When he is harassing Justin, one of the hostages, you hear how the devastating events that lead up to the loss of his eyesight still affects him today. “Let me guess. She refuses to get an abortion. She's Catholic, sure, but those girls are only ever Catholic after the fact. It never stops them from taking their panties off in rubberless African countries, does it?" (pg. 102, The Effect of Living Backwards). Bruno's tangent about Catholic girls and “after the fact” makes you wonder, why is he so worked up about someone else's problem? Bruno's "Shame Story" tells of how he met his wife, a former nun, and how a legless neighbor and Bruno's own sick games changes his life forever. "She confessed to me the reason she'd left the Church. She had always found people without limbs, noses, crucial body parts to be loathsome. They made her sick, no matter how many times she went to confession." (pg. 119, The Effect of Living Backwards). After hearing this Bruno decides to play a trick on his wife to test her to see how much she loves him. He is convinced that she will love and be with him forever no matter what. He has a friend glue his eyes shut and fakes an accident and tells his wife he has gone blind. She reacts poorly and leaves the house. After removing the glue he becomes sick, "It's just a reaction to the glue, I told myself, to the stress of my wife's leaving me. It wasn't until too late that I discovered I'd contracted a virus, something I'd picked up in Borneo, at least that's what the doctor deduced...Blindness occurred only in the rarest of cases." (pg. 126, The Effect of Living backwards)
There is something slightly humorous about how Bruno lost his eyesight. Playing mean spirited tricks and games on his own wife caused him the greatest heartbreak, losing his eyesight. Perhaps, had he not glued his eyes shut and tricked his wife, the blindness never would have occurred?
Fantasy realism is how you could describe Alice's thought pattern. Her fantasies involve real people and ideas but not a real relationship. If they did involve a real relationship and life with Pitcairn, it would be heartbreaking for Alice, if he did not live up to the idea she had painted in her head of who he is.
'Joe the Plumber' Calls Himself 'blunt'
In Judy Budnitz’s book Flying Leap both humor and heartbreak are used throughout the story Average Joe. Joe Morris begins receiving phone calls and visits from famous individuals; all of whom are asking for his advice. The first call informs him that he is the quintessential man and thus makes a good representative for the general masses. Upon learning this he immediately responds by asking, “So you’re saying I’m special?”(pg.95, Flying Leap) The humor here is that he is only special by being the most ordinary. Most people would not be excited to learn that they are average but the constant questioning over the phone and frequent visits gave Joe a sense of recognition that was completely unfamiliar to him but he welcomed it nonetheless. After all it was about time he got noticed for once. Eventually the phone stops ringing and no one visits to ask questions until he gets one final phone call, a simple follow up question. He is informed by the caller that he is no longer the statistical average man, to which he replies, “How can that be?” Joe is shocked, confused and ultimately hurt that no one is interested in his opinion any longer. “[Joe] couldn’t believe no one had any questions for [him].”(pg.108, Flying Leap) He liked all the attention he was getting but now he’s back to the same old Joe, with his TV programs, case of beer, and faithful companion Sheena. With this renewed peace and quiet Joe concludes, “I ought to be perfectly happy.” Budnitz is implying that, despite the incessant pestering, Joe is heartbroken, so to speak, because no one needs him anymore. He ought to be happy but can’t quite figure why he is not. He misses that recognition that he briefly experienced.
The story “End of the Line” perfectly illustrates this in Aimee Bender’s, Willful Creatures. This whole story revolves around a big man and his pet little man. The big man has faced heartbreak on many different levels. He has no wife or children we come to understand that the big man “didn’t like politeness and he didn’t like people.”(pg.20, Willful Creatures). The book further describes how no one noticed his new coat at work, and a woman who he asked out turned him down by embarrassing him to other coworkers. Clearly, the big man was lonely and had no one to turn to except his pet little man.
At first, the big man and the little man got along, but soon the little man expressed his feelings of wanting to leave and return to his family. This hurt the big man feelings. The one and only companion he had, wanted to desert him; hence, the big man’s heart breaks again. This time the big man retaliated. He turned his feelings of abandonment into feelings of aggression.
In order to fully explain how the big man’s actions of hostility toward the little man can be considered humorous, we must look at Hobbes theory of humor. In summary, Hobbes, theory states that humor is “aggressive expression of power and judgment over another.” In other words, “laughter (humor) arises when we take fleeting satisfaction in our superiority over another person.” This is exactly what the big man began to do to the little man. He began to find pleasure in asserting his power over the little man. He humiliated the little man by stuffing him in his pants and forcing the little man to show him his penis. He also physically abused him the more the little man cried out in pain and begged to go home, the more the big man tortured him. By doing this, he was trying to feel better about himself. However, the little man soon expressed that he was no longer afraid of the big man, and he had become numb. ”The little man folded his hands under his cheek in a pillow. Pain was no longer a mystery to him, and a man familiar with pain has entered a new kind of freedom.”(pg. 23, Willful Creatures) Once the big man realized that the little man no longer cared about the situation, the big man set him free. This proves that the big man was only happy when someone else was as miserable as he was. Once he realized that the little man no longer cared, that meant that the little man was no longer going to express any type of misery. When he did this, he removed the big man from his place of superiority over him. Therefore, the big man no longer found humor in the situation.
Group Members: Kevin S. Dehn, Charlene Winburn, Lauren Kohne, Brian Clements
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Anatomy of Humor: Mary Karr
Chapter 3 gives bad news of Grandma’s cancer. Her condition is getting worse and they soon find that she has to get her leg amputated. Of course, Mary could care less if this happens. Everyone else prepares to visit her in the hospital after the procedure. At the hospital, Mother is comforting, Lecia walks right up to the bed to talk to her, but Mary stands at the foot of the bed, disgusted. Mary is simply excited that she may be able to play in her wheelchair when they return home. Back at home, the girls return to their normal childhood. We learn of a game that the neighborhood kids called “Torture”. They reenact scenes from history such as the natural disasters and the Holocaust. One time the younger kids are packed together in a tiny old pigeon cage, while the older kids are acting as torturers. The kids are not allowed to leave until told so. In this game, Mary is the last one left. One of the teenage boys gets her out of the cage and leads her to someone’s garage. Unfortunately, Mary is raped. This boy walks her home as if nothing has happened. However, the teenage boy does not tell her not to tell anyone, Mary knew not to tell. It’s sad the things that happen to children that adults at times know nothing about until it is too late.
In Chapter, four Grandma’s cancer spreads to her brain. Instead of slowing her down, it makes her bear down harder on the household. She is definitely in pain but instead of taking her medication, she drinks a six-pack of beer everyday. Grandma develops cataracts and Mary cannot stand to look at her cloudy eyes. Grandma finds joys in finding fault in everything the girls do and orders Charlie to beat them. Emotionally beaten Charlie does as she is told. The girls take the beatings, for they are not injurious.
During the second section of the book, there are multiple instances where Karr uses humor to draw the reader in, as well as to cushion the blow of the difficulties she faces in her day-to-day life. One example of humor in chapters 5-9 is when Mary’s father tells the Liars’ Club the story about his father dying by hanging to death. In no way is death by hanging humorous, but the fact that this story is completely false and fabricated does lend for some humor because Mary clues the reader into the truth, therefore the audience knows more than the people in the story.
Another instance of humor is the part in the book where I laughed aloud while reading for the first time in this book. It comes in the last sentence of chapter 9 after Charlie informs her daughters that she is going to be getting married yet again to a man that they have not even met. Charlie says “Say hello to your new daddy” and Mary narrates, “Lecia whispered what I was already thinking. Oh shit.” This is funny because although as a reader I could not directly relate to Mary and Lecia’s situation, I was thinking exactly the same thing and it became funny once Lecia voiced my thoughts. These situations spread throughout the book and provide some humor in instances that may not necessarily meet the traditional standards of what is funny.
According to Freud’s theory of humor, jokes are hostile such as this to act as a defense mechanism. These girls are saddened by their mother’s abuse of alcohol and drugs, so they use it in play as a way of making it ok for them.“Meth-am-pheta-mean, Diet Pill will make you scream. Meth-am-pheta-mean keep you fighting, keep you lean.”
The Divine Secrets of The YaYa Sisterhood is a great example of the type of family dysfunction that the Karr's have. An alcoholic mother, and a daughter who is writing about her childhood.
Friday, November 28, 2008
The Life of Mary Karr
Mary Karr is an American poet and memoirist. She was born on January 16, 1955 in Groves, Texas to JP and Charlie Marie Karr. Growing up in east Texas Mary developed a biting sense of humor that brings her books to life. After a brief stay in Los Angeles, California Mary moved to St. Paul, Minnesota to attend Macalester College before leaving to travel the country for two years. She later enrolled into graduate school at Goddard College in 1979. This is where she met friend and mentor Tobias Wolff. In 1983, Mary married poet Mike Milburn they had one son Dev, before they later divorced. Mary has served as assistant professor at Tufts University, Emerson College, Harvard and Sarah Lawrence College. Karr has received numerous awards and accolades including the Guggenheim Fellowship, Pushcart Prize, Bunting Fellowship (Radcliffe College), The Whiting Writer's Award National Endowment for the Arts grant. She is currently Jesse Peck professor at Syracuse University in New York.
The Liar's Club
In 1995 Mary Karr exploded into the writing world with a bang. The Liars’ Club tells of Karrs troubled childhood in fictional Leechfield, Texas. With a father who is not around, a mother she says “Fancied herself a bohemian Scarlett O’Hara” (pg 11 Liars Club) and stead fast older sister Lecia, Mary’s family draws you in with all there eccentricities. The Liars’ Club received critical acclaim and stayed on the New York Times best sellers list for over a year. In 1996 Mary received the PEN/Martha Albrand Award for best first non-fiction work.
"At some point the fire fades to orange background, and I stare only at mother's face. It is all streaked up with lipstick and soot, so she looks like a bonifide maniac." (Liar's Club, p 152) You can relate Mary's childhood to that of her mother's favorite song "Mack the Knife". This depicts how Mary's mother at times can be deceiving and give the illusion that she is content in her role as a matriarch keeping her teeth tightly concealed beneath her smile. Through out the book you see the mother's mood go from stable to "nervous". It is in these times of nervousness that Charlie Marie bears her teeth.
"Oh the shark has zippy teeth, dear,
Cherry
In September 2001 Mary Karr leapt back into the New York Times best sellers list, once again, with her insatiable coming of age memoir Cherry. With her no nonsense humor and raging hormones Karr weaves a delicate web that is an adolescents girls sexual awaking. Cherry is at times shocking but hard to put down. It also divulges into the murky waters of Karr's use of illegal drugs and alcohol. Enamored with the Hippie culture and a group of laid back surfers Mary dives head first into the world of LSD, marijuana and pills. Of the experience she says “I also learned about funerals early. The book opens when I'm moving to California with this bunch of surfers who hollowed out a board to transport a brick of pot and various pharmaceuticals. Most of them went to prison. Two were suicides. One vanished into the Witness Protection Program. The only ones thriving today are me and my pal Doonie, and we both stopped drinking and drugging more than a decade ago. That says something about how the countercultural winds blew over me.” (1997-2008 Barnesandnoble.com llc)
(http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Cherry/Mary-Karr/e/9780141002071#EXC )
"Sure you were told that drugs cut a coiled and downward swerving path to degradation if not death. That was part of their allure." (Independent News and Media Limited) Littered with drugs, Jimmy Hendrix, overdoses, and suicide Cherry will pull at your heart and leave tears of laughter in your eyes.
Sinners Welcome
In 1996 Mary Karr shocked her fans by converting to Catholicism. She did so after an ex-heroin addict told her to get on her knees and pray for help to stop drinking. She took the advice and from it birthed a new look on life and her fourth volume of poetry, Sinners Welcome. Of the choice she made to stop drinking she says, "I haven't had a drink for about 16 years. It just took three minutes a day. When I first started praying, it was just, ""Help me stay sober. Thanks."" (www.beliefnet.com)
When asked about the title and how she chose the name Mary states, "At the church I went to in Syracuse, there is a banner outside that says "Sinners Welcome". The church is located in the poorest part of Syracuse, where all half-way houses are. Therefore, about 20-30% of the parish are disabled, either physically or mentally. I always loved walking in under that banner. I used to think you had to be good to go to church. Turns out you can go whether or not you have been to confession. Who needs it more than a sinner?" (www.beliefnet.com) In Sinners Welcome, Mary Karr takes a daring leap by mixing faith, love, and the remnants of a rebellious adolescent all into one book.
How the reader can relate to Karrs works
Mary Karr said it best when she told David Ian Miller, "On a good day for me, I'm in touch with the human heart, the human comedy, and the human drama." (www.sfgate.com, Finding My Religion) A well rounded and provocative writer, Karr draws on the three things we crave as humans. Throughout her books and poems she is able to consistently pull the reader in with a cynical best friend like humor.
Work Cited:
Barnesandnoble.com llc 1997-2008
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Cherry/Mary-Karr/e/9780141002071#EXC
Belief Net
http://www.beliefnet.com/Faiths/Christianity/Catholic/2006/06/Mary-Karr-Guided-By-Prayer.aspx
Google Images
Google.com
Karr, Mary
Liars’ Club
1995 Published by
Penguin Books
375 Hudson St. New York, New York 10014
Lappin, Elena
(Cherry by Mary Karr) Article
Friday, 22 June 2001
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/cherry-by-mary-karr-675087.html
Miller, David Ian
"Finding my religon"
YouTube.Com
Group members
Kevin S. Dehn , Jeanette DiGiovenale,Jennifer Hasselbach
Thursday, November 27, 2008
An Anatomy of Humor: Heidi Julavits
The book starts out in one of the main character’s views. Her name is Alice, and she is trying to get into the International Institute for Terrorist Studies in Lucerne. As Alice tells the admissions officer of her life, she gets asked the question “How can you be so certain?”. Right away one of the situations that Monro mentioned that creates laughter, something masquerading as something that they are not, comes in to play. The first sentence of the novel is “When I arrived at the Institute, my name was still Alice…” and at the end of the prologue, she ends up making out with one of her professors and thinking to herself “ It was not the sort of thing that ‘Alice’ would ever do, and therein lay its singular appeal.”
At the beginning of chapter one Alice and her sister, Edith, are flying to Morocco for Edith’s wedding. Hobbes said that laughter is mean spirited, and throughout this chapter, Alice makes fun of how “blond” Edith is. She tells Edith that she is losing her “spark”, that ever since she got engaged, she hasn’t been the same sexy promiscuous woman that she knew. Then Alice admits that saying that was a “mean and petty sibling maneuver” which made her feel better about herself because she humiliated Edith.
All of the shame stories are narrated by the person whose shame it is. In “A Mother’s Shame”, Alice and Edith’s mother is on a trip to Machu Picchu with her aunt. This story is funny because it seems like whenever Alice and Edith’s mom isn’t around her aunt, both of them are having sex. According to Monro, indecency is one of the criteria of laughter.
In chapter Two Alice tells of how she is not yet a very observant person. She learned to be very observant when she was taking an exam at International Institute for Terrorist Studies in Lucerne. Alice had been up all night studying for the exam and being interrogated, as had everyone else in her class, and the professor walked in forty-five minutes late and informed everyone that the exam had been moved to another room. The exam had been moved because the professor said that the room was being painted a “brighter shade of ecru”. The last question on the exam was “What color were the original walls in the Curtis Fishbeiner Lecture Hall?” the answers they could choose from were “Shell Pink, British Khaki, Petit Beurre, and Ecru”. The true original shade of the walls were Petit Beurre, and since the majority of the students trusted the professor when he said that they were ecru, everyone failed the exam. This would be an example of any shortage of knowledge or skill, that Monro explains.
In Cyrus’ Shame, Hobbes’ theory is put to work when Cyrus is on the train and sees a fat woman running to catch up to the departing train. Before she saw him staring at her, I think he was amused. When she yelled for help, he decided to help her, but she did not make the train. The only thing he had of hers was her handbag, which he stole her money out of.
The humor in chapter three can be seen through a scene where Bruno is interrogating Justin about his girlfriend. Bruno is telling Justin about his girlfriend and how un-catholic she acts, “but those girls are only ever catholic after the fact” he says. Bruno uses this humiliation to make Justin feel that he is inferior to Bruno. According to Hobbes, humor is a way to show judgment or power over someone else. Bruno does this well by pointing out to Justin that his girlfriend is still with him for herself, not for him.
In the fourth chapter, Smythes uses a Freudian type of humor by pointing out the sameness in two very dissimilar things. During a lecture at the Institute, he points out how the ideal way to hold hostages in a terrorism situation is much the same as holding a dinner party. “If the terrorist assembles his guests with sagacity,” he says, “the party will run itself. He can sit back and let ‘humanity’ dictate the behavior of his hostages; he need barely posses a gun.” Later in the chapter another Freudian type of humor was used by Alice. She defined “fright distance” as a way to measure fear. This is a play on words; the phrase flight distance is used when describing the distance of a specific flight pattern.
During “Winnie’s Shame” we see a type of humor as defined by Henri Bergson. Bergson believed that humor was a way of self policing through humiliation. In this chapter Winnie sets out to find her father, and when she finally does, she lies to him about who she is so that she can interview him. When she does meet him she is disappointed by who she finds. Her father is not a great man, he is merely a bad poet. After this humiliating experience Winnie is not likely to question her reality again the way she did by trying to find a person who was not in her life for a reason.
Situational humor and scenarios – Alice and Edith’s father questions the girls on moral dilemmas.
Choices and reasons- whether Alice would use the wire cutters to end the hijacking. What was her reason to not cut the wire?
Imaginary love- Alice’s unusual attraction to Pitcairn.
Bruno’s wife- afraid to disabled people. Bruno tried to see her reaction to his fake blindness. She actually left him.
“Gesina’s Shame” is the shame story of Gesina, the hotel worker who is in cahoots with the hijackers. In “Gesina’s Shame” we learn that when she was a young girl, her mother took a job in Switzerland as a private teacher for two young boys in a wealthy family. Gesina and her mother move to Switzerland and move into the estate of the wealthy family. As far as we know the family consists of a father and two sons of somewhat similar age. Gesina and her mother are forced to live above the carriage house. Gesina’s toys are confiscated and she is forbidden from interacting with the two boys. The narrator tells us that this is because the father feared that if the boys had any kind of distraction from study then they would become competitive and attempt to kill each other. As the story continues, the young Gesina attempts, several times unsuccessfully, to gain the interest of each of the boys and get them to play with her. Then, Gesina finds a red rubber ball. With this ball Gesina is finally able to manipulate the boys into playing with her. She convinces each of them that the other is sneaking out to the carriage house to play with her and the red rubber ball. They each become intrigued and end up sneaking out to the carriage house to play. On the day that Gesina and her mother are set to leave she invites each of the boys to come out and play with her at separate times. They both end up being there at the same time and the ball is destroyed. The boys begin to fight one another and there is a terrible storm outside. The boys fight near the fence and Gesina sees their father outside with a rifle. She hears a loud boom and then she sees nothing by the fence. As she leaves she thinks she sees a ghost rapped in bandages in an upper window of the house. She later sees the older brother many years down the line. We are led to believe that this older brother is the now blinded Bruno, who tells Gesina that he lost his eyes while playing with his younger brother, who we are led to believe is Pitcairn.
As the rest of the main story continues, Alice is at the hotel, with the rest of the hostages, along with their captors. While eating yet another meager meal, an argument erupts and Bruno, out of what seems to be an overwhelming sense of failure and frustration, proclaims that everyone is free to go. Alice goes upstairs to retrieve Winnie, but discovers she is bleeding. They call an ambulance and everyone is loaded in. They are all driven far from the city to a helicopter and while they are loading into the helicopter Winnie has her baby. Everyone, with the exception of Bruno and Edith, gets in the helicopter, and as Alice attempts to board she falls out and the helicopter takes off. So, Alice returns to the hotel to try and find Edith. When she returns, Edith is there with no sign of Bruno. Edith is tearing up the floor searching for her engagement ring. Alice convinces her that they must leave. Alice evacuates first, and while she is outside “falling stars”(bombs) bombard the hotel and it goes up in a blaze. Alice, while attempting to reenter the burning building, is confronted by Bruno who tells her with extreme jubilation that he has won and Pitcairn has lost. He also informs Alice that Edith sold her out and has been selling her out from the beginning. Alice ignores him and saves Edith anyway, even though she knows Edith had been working against her. The story continues into the future and Alice is the guardian of the now deceased Winnie’s daughter. Edith is married and living overseas. Alice is not sure of the point of the entire hijacking experience. She finds herself dreaming/fantasizing about the nonexistent life between her and Pitcairn. And at the very end of the book, in an imaginary letter for Pitcairn, we learn that perhaps all of the shame stories had been told by alice. “if you could tell him, please, tell him when you see him next, that I am alone again and just my plain old self, not Cyrus, not Sad or Winnie or Bruno or my mother.”[350] These of course are the names of most of the shame stories.
The humor in this story or at least this section of the story is somewhat hard to find. After all, the story is not exactly full of all kinds of laugh out loud humor. However, there is one part in particular that is quite humorous or comical. During “Gesina’s Shame” when she first plays with the younger brother and the ball in the carriage house crawl space. The whole scene plays out like a kind of awkward first-time clumsy sexual experience. “This isn’t fun. I thought this was supposed to be fun. It’s never fun the first time, I said. Nor the second nor the third. But it is intriguing how it makes you feel dirty and that is why you will do it.”[286] Of course she is talking about playing with the boy and the red rubber ball, but it sounds like she is talking about something completely different. This is why it is humorous. According to Freud there are several reasons why something is humorous. First, the naïve, Freud contends that an instance of the naïve is comic. It is because the naïve is a difference between inhibitions. Gesina does not have the same inhibitions as the younger brother. This is comical. Also, this is an instance of a conceptual joke, and Freud contends that these jokes are examples of faulty thinking and diverging from what is actually being said. In this instance we are somewhat forced in to the faulty thinking and diverging from what is actually being said. Gesina is talking about playin with the ball but the way it is said sounds a lot like a first time sexual encounter.
There are a lot of instances in this novel when many of the theories that Freud, Hobbes, Monro, and others that we discussed in class were used. As we said in class, however, it is very hard to dissect humor without taking it apart so far that you lose the humor.
Alisa, Jonathan, Jeanette, Caitlin
Works Cited
Julavits, Heidi. The Effect of Living Backwards. New York: Berkley Trade, 2004.
Freud, Sigmund . "Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious"
www.blackboard.uc.edu
Google images
www.google.com
www.nataliedee.com
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Effect of Living Backwards Review
"Backwards is a colorful, bright, funny, and intriguing and you genuinely care about Alice. Her smartly off-kilter sarcasm and sharp, cynical sound bites allow her to cope... while Julavits's elliptical narrative makes our own days seem boring and linear by contrast."--- Seattle Weekly
The Effect of Living Backwards, is a story about a woman named Alice who is a dropout social work student who by "chance" gets on a plane bound for Mellila, that is hijacked by a blind man, and his two accomplices. Alice and the other passengers are taken for the most interesting flight of their lives. It is not until Alice speaks with the man named Pitcairn from the International Institute for Terrorist Studies in Lucerne that she begins to wonder about the situation and its meaning. Each of the passengers are armed with their truths and shame.
This story is about an 18 year old girl who goes to Peru with her aunt (Aunt Bea). Aunt Bea is a pretty woman, but mocks any man who is kind to her. In Peru the first man Aunt Bea spurns is a balding English-man. In the end, her niece, who we later find is Alice’s mother, ends up sleeping with the balding man. After thinking on her escapade for a while, she and her aunt visit Machu Picchu. In the tour, she stays with the tour group but Aunt Bea soon disappears but she believes she simply decided to walk the exhibits on her own. A bony man leads Aunt Bea into the picnic area where her niece is and says he rescued her from being neck deep in a mud pit. The boy who rescued her is a bug boy at the exhibit and his name is Harold. Aunt Bea’s niece grows very fond of Harold. Ten months later, Harold tracks down the niece in the States and they agree to marry. It’s like the typical storybook ending. But The Effects of Living Backwards is not the typical storybook, so what significance does Mother’s shame story have?
Through out the entire story, there are many references to these shame stories. Many of the characters mention that life is meaningless, meaning is only ascribed by you. What you may find meaningful, only carries meaning to yourself. This story is a mind bender, it keeps you wondering what is real and what is not. It really shows that hind sight is the only way you can ascribe meaning.
"The rule is, jam to-morrow and jam yesterday--but never jam today."
"It must come sometimes to 'jam to-day,'" Alice objected.
"No, it can't," said the Queen."It's jam every other day: to-day isn't any other day, you know."
"I don't understand you," Alice said. "It's dreadfully confusing!"
"That's the effect of living backwards," the Queen said kindly: "it always makes one a little giddy at first--" --- Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass (and What Alice Found There)
Monday, November 24, 2008
Feminist Humor
-Maryon Pearson-
Feminism is the belief in the political, social, and economic equality of women. Women seeking change in this country have accomplished forms of equality through feminist movements. Feminism is considered to be divided into 3 movements. The first movement was legal equality, the second was socioeconomic equality, and the third was ultimate equality. The first movement works towards giving women basic human rights. For example, at the beginning of the twentieth century, women finally gained grounds to vote in 1920.(Gwyn Kirk)
This was only the start of women uniting to change oppression against women. There was a large increase in the number of female writers in this time period. A large portion of that writing contained feminist humor with such writers as Margaretta Newell and Mary Austin. Both of these writers had prominent articles written in that time that reflected on women’s roles in society.(Gwyn Kirk)
The second part of the movement involved women changing their roles in society. An example seen of this was in the 1940s and 1950s. At that time women entered the workplace due to a lack of men for the war effort. This shift in socioeconomic role forever changed the idea that women were meant solely to remain at home and be house wives. This is when the fight for equality in the workplace began.(Gwyn Kirk)
Women worked in terrible conditions and for less money than men. Men were terrified by womens' eagerness to work and get an education. Even today, women are paid $.77 to every man’s $1. The right for women to get an education has been sought after by women to attain equality in social status. We discussed this when reading about Nancy Walker and the idea that education withered the body and would cause problems in child bearing. Men were threatened by women’s intellect.(Gwyn Kirk)
Feminist humor rose from the feminist movement. Women began using humor as a tool for their frustration. In the beginning, men thought women were not worthy of being humorous and women who did write with humor were considered unwomanly and masculine. Humor theorist, Nancy Walker, says that humor was seen as unusual from women because women are considered to be emotional. Women were meant to be quiet and subordinate. For that reason, women often wrote under pen names so their voices could be heard. Men frequently would refuse to read something they knew a woman wrote.(Walker)
In more modern day, feminist humor is still prevalent but has a very different style. Women still find a lot of use of humor on topics which are considered based towards women such as working in the home and home life. For example, Julia Slavin’s novel is set in a suburban area and deals with the mom, Wendy, and her son, Dylan. Many women still find the use of comedy as a means for getting attention on a true issue. Female humorists use several different types of discourse to practice their humor. One style rising in popularity is “stand-up” performance. It is interesting to note, that women have made large strides but differences are still found. A female cannot publicly say that same things as a man without it being taken in a different way.
For example, men commonly use vulgar humor which is very explicit about sex. Very few female stand-up comedians can entertain a crowd with the same kind of vulgarity. If a crowd does respond to a woman’s use of that humor, it’s partially from the unusual nature of a woman being so vulgar in public. Women are still expected to be somewhat demure in hostile humor is rarely taken as well from a woman as it would be from a man. One female stand-up comedian both beloved and hated for her vulgar humor is Kathy Griffin. Roseanne Barr and Lisa Lampanelli are other prime examples of modern female humorists given negative reviews for their vulgar style. Also, Aimee Bender’s short story entitled, “Mother Fucker” caught every one’s attention because of the vulgarity of it; this was not an expected title from a woman.
Chelsea Handler
Many other female humorists take use of novels and short stories as a means for sharing their feminist humor. Feminism is based off of the idea of inequality. The use of irony or satire to reflect those ignored inequalities is popular in feminist writing. Chelsea Handler is a woman that has her own television show and has written a few books. Her works use lots of irony and satire while discussing the differences between men and women. She also goes for shock by blatantly discussing topics such as sex.
Nancy Walker states that women humor now deals with the perception of self. Lorrie Moore’s short stories from Self Help are a great example of humor relating the perception of the self. In the story “Go Like This,” a woman describes how she is planning her own suicide. Perception of the body is also common in feminist humor today, says Walker. “Skin Care,” a short story by Judy Budnitz discusses body image.
Feminist Humor is always evolving. Watch how different these two comics are.
Another common tool seen in feminist humor is the flipping of common gender roles in a piece of work for comic effect. Our laughter in those instances recognizes our pre conceived notions of female versus male roles in society. Both male and female humorists comment on the differences between men and women. Male humorists tend to make their commentary with a demeaning tone towards women. The inappropriateness of their tone in modern times gives them a shock value earning a laugh. Female humorists tend to make their commentary with a frustrated tone. They can comment on a range of issues; whether it is social inequality or lack of chivalry in modern day.(Stillon)
In the beginning feminist humor was needed as a way of bringing around major social change. In modern day feminist humor is focused towards overall equality. Modern feminist humor may not always be directly attacking the gap between men and women. In modern day, feminist humor is seen more when women refuse to line up to their established societal role.
Sources:
"Ellen Degeneres-One Night Stand part 1." YouTube. 22 Nov. 2008. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVy3m8retZE
Gwyn Kirk and Margot Okazawa-Rey. Women’s Lives: A Multicultural Approach. McGraw Hill Companies Inc. 2007 New York.
"Last Comic Standing-Iliza Schlesinger." YouTube. 22 Nov. 2008. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1cT_w6wvzk&feature=related
Stillion, Judith. Feminist Humor: who appreciates it and why. Psychology of women quarterly, 11 (2): 219-232.
Walker, Nancy. "A Very Dangerous Thing." http://www.blackboard.uc.edu
Created By:
Katie Frisbee, Missy Feltz, Samantha Speiles, Jeanette Digiovenale
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Biography of Heidi Julavits
Heidi was born in Portland, Maine to an English teacher and a lawyer. She attended Dartmouth College and after graduating, Julavits traveled to Japan until she returned to the US to work odd jobs such as a waitress, copywriter and teacher. She eventually enrolled in the graduate writing program at Columbia and took writing classes to improve. Julavits had a difficult time finding work until she met with a man named Dave Eggers who put a piece of her work in an issue of the Esquire. Her writing attracted the attention of G.P. Putnam’s Sons and a literary deal was worked out and her first novel, The Mineral Palace ,was published. The novel was given mixed reviews but Julavits says, "I would read a reviews with the tiniest little criticisms in it, and I would be completely under the table for three days." Mixed reviews never stopped Julavits and in 2003 her second novel, The Effect of Living Backwards was published. Heidi Julavits was able to overcome some challenges regarding the controversy surrounding the topic of a hijacking after the attacks of 9/11. Critics looked at Julavits’ second novel as “more livelier” and said she was able to go back to her black humor, unlike what was found in The Mineral Palace.
Along with turbulence within her writing, Heidi found trouble in her first marriage to Manny Howard, a former magazine editor. She married him in 1997 and divorced in 1999 after discovering he had been stealing money from her bank account. She then remarried another author, Ben Marcus in 2002 and they began editing a literary magazine, The Believer, together. They currently have one child and reside in Maine but travel back and forth between Portland and Brooklyn.
Heidi Julavits is an eminent author who has shown to have several successful types of writings published throughout her career. Her credentials and experiences have led her to become more and more established in the literary field. In 1998, Julavits started her career with short stores and had her first one discovered in the Esquire magazine. In the same year, she also made two book deals with a publishing company, Putnam. Her writing includes books as well as short stories which have been published in The Best American Short Stories 1999, Zoetrope, McSweeney’s, and Time. Her main debut which established her as a respectable book writer was a novel known as The Mineral Palace in 2000. Another famous novel later written by Julavits was, The Effect of Living Backwards, which was labeled and awarded as a “New York Times Notable Book” and a “San Francisco Chronicle Best Book of the Year.” Following after her many publications, Julavits was able to acquire the position as the editor of a well established literary journal called The Believer and a journalist for Esquire, Harper’s Bazaar, and the New York Times Magazine. Julavits has proven to be a very talented writer through the basis of her past accomplishments and experiences.
.
On the other hand, some critics did not consider Julavits’ writings as overall good pieces of work. According to a post by Anita Gates in the New York Times, there were shortcomings and dislikes found with Julavits's type of style and some of her ways of portraying information to the readers. Some readers have a difficult time making sense of Julavits’ meaning and purpose behind her stories. Some who reviewed Julavits’ books and styles of writing recommended the reader to read her book in one sitting in order to keep from getting lost in her story lines. Julavits tends to fill her books with many events and dialogue which can confuse readers at times. According to Elsa Gaztambide, “Julavits' writing style is a sophisticated balance of suspense, humor, and intellectually stimulating prose, which produces a novel unfit for the easygoing reader because of its intense and profoundly dark undertones.” Therefore, not everyone finds Julavits’ stories pleasant and would not consider her writing style to be proficient.
The Uses of Enchantment
The Uses of Enchantment, Julavits’ third novel, has been described as "[A] crisply written but overcomplicated novel, a cat's cradle with so many overlapping fibs, stories-within-stories, allusions, and red herrings that even multiple readings won't release all the knots. " Entertainment Weekly.
Booklist said it was "[A] moodily atmospheric yet sometimes wildly funny tale of sick, twisted love, into which Julavits effectively reels the reader by juxtaposing past and present, factual and conjectural sequences”
The Uses of Enchantment was published in 2006 and follows her pattern of dark stories that have a serious subject line. As in The Effect of Living Backwards, with a terrorist plot, this novel deals with the subject of kidnapping and witchcraft.
The story takes place in 1985 at a prep school where a 16 year old girl, Mary Veal, is abducted after a field hockey practice. She suddenly reappears and there become questions about her abduction. Did it really happen? Mary has no recollections about what happened to her and her mother thought it would be a good idea if she went to a psychiatrist named Dr. Hammer. Mary’s mother was socially conscious, yet came from a background of Salem witches. Mary is very hostel towards the doctor and he soon realizes her memories of the abduction is coming from a 17th century story about an Indian girls’ abduction. The doctor and Mary’s mother come to question whether the abduction really occurred and if Mary made all of it up.
Julavits follows her pattern of writing in the present and past and back and forth when Mary returns to her old town 15 years later for her mothers’ funeral and begins questioning her past and the people in it.
Below is a link to a video of Heidi Julavits describing how in a way this third novel was somewhat “autobiographical” and how her past living in a Victorian house and being allowed to play in a creepy cemetery gave her somewhat of a basis for this book. She also talks about how in her writings she creates adolescent women who are destructive and have had tortured rough lives, (such as Anne Frank, Ask Alice) as has her main characters and have something destructive such as kidnapping and hijackings occur in her novels. Yet as characters they are become strong, important, and in her words, “special”. Julavits believes that young adult women readers relate in some ways to these characters.
The work of Julavits is not limited to a purely written format. Hotel Andromeda is a short story that she has composed as she might any other, but she collaborates with a photographer named Jenny Gage to add a visual element to the work. The raw style of Gage’s photographic work coupled with Julavits’ sometimes very on edge style of writing blend together creating synthetic multi-sensory experience. The story itself revolves around the live of quintuplets who are abandoned by their mother who had undergone a process of artificial insemination, taking a samples from five “ …screened, gold-medalled men whose sperm was centrifugally spun into cellular cotton candy and layered over a glass honeycomb tray.” The five girls grow up to be little more than living, breathing science experiments living in a hotel and having daily visits with a certain Dr. Gloria. Their days are spent squandering, pillow fights and the immature behavior of adolescents marks their existence. In contrast the photographic work reflects haggard women in their late 20’s or 30’s, which look off at nothing in particular, reflecting little emotion as though they are internally broken. The humor in this work can be found in the insights into the women’s mindsets, and a deeper meaning can be found in the emotional trials in the lives of our specimens. The women take a downward turn after one of the five disappears, leading them ultimately break down and Danielle, brightest of the five reveals her inner feelings of inadequacy and isolation. To give an example of the humor found in this writing here is an excerpt of a question posed by their doctor, which also gives insight to the mindsets of the young women:
“Do you wish your mother would visit?
Regina: No
Lydia: No
Pamela: I don’t care
Dora: Do you wish your mother would visit?
Danielle: Our mother should do what she likes.”
Julavits vs. Slavin
Heidi Julavits and Julia Slavin represent a class of contemporary feminist authors who are adept at writing scathing and witty social and political satires. The status quo is called into question through the use of anecdotes on the everyday reality in which everyday people live. Julavits in The Effect of Living Backwards takes an approach that is more grounded in the realm of actual possibility, while Slavin in Carnivore Diet takes us into the world of magical realism. Both, however, seem to have the same effect on a reader in their use of the use of everyday situations and conversations that anyone for the most part could see themselves in and relate to. Both authors are also on the cutting edge in challenging old stereotypes as in the traditional roles of women in society, revealing a more ambitious independent image of women. The feminist element is only one of many that contribute to these well rounded and thought out satires as both authors are actually attacking, in a humorous way, all segments of modern American society, through their own unique perspectives.
Writing Style
Overall, Julavits has a unique style of fictional writing which some consider creative and inventive while others find it unusual. One thing that can be observed about Julavits is that although her books contain some absurdities, she conveys a bit more realism in her stories then by past authors we have read such as Bender. For example, The Effects of Living Backward has a more realistic view of two sisters who share a love/hate relationship compared to a family with pumpkins for heads as we see in Bender’s writings. Many of Julavits’ works do tend to have an exceptional type of humor that can also appear unpromising. Julavits also admitted that her first novel, The Mineral Palace, is not normally like something she would write because of its overall sense of seriousness. In her later writings, Julavits incorporated more humor in her works. When referring to The Effect of Living Backwards, she said, "Since my first novel was primarily bleak, I really wanted to inject some humor into this new book." Also when being interviewed about her writing style, Julavits said, "I am a fan of literature that is funny but kind of savage at the same time. The books I love most are the ones that make you laugh, but an hour later, there's an aftertaste of despair." Even though she has humor in her writing, many of her stories reveal to the readers serious topics through imaginative and metaphoric ways.
Julavits is known for convey real life experiences in her writings and focuses more on modern themes. One prime example is when she referred to the terrorist attack as “The Big Terrible” rather than calling it “911”. Her message about “The Big Terrible” can be put in the perspective of real life experiences just like the tragic event of September 11th. Furthermore, as a reader, one can see the theme of human nature and truth in Julavits’ writing. Many of the ideas from Julavits’ stories come from her very own personal experiences. The Mineral Palace was about a young bride who moves to Colorado to be with her husband. Some of the events in the novel come from her grandmother’s personal experiences. Furthermore, one thing that inspired Julavits in the plot of, The Effect of Living Backwards, was when she was young, one of her cousins was killed on a plan that was bombed by terrorists in Rome.
Terrorist Attack (Side note)
Readers may pay special attention to the fact that Julavits actually started writing The Effect of Living Backwards before the event of September 11th. Here are direct quotes from an interview pertaining to the accommodations she had to make just recently after the event.
“I decided that I relied too heavily on landscape in my first book to do the lion’s share of the psychological work—not that this was a fault in the book, but rather it was a strength of mine that made me subsequently weak in other ways. So deciding to set my entire book in an airplane was the conceptual equivalent of tying my stronger hand behind my back. That said, of course, I since have moved out of the airplane, and my book is hardly, hardly, short. I also failed to follow my own restrictions, and introduced a formal element, alternating each chapter with confessionals by ancillary characters, which ends up blowing the whole plane idea wide open. Of course, I am up against an entirely new set of challenges now, given that the book is not only set on an airplane, it features a hijacking. My choice to pursue this subject matter has been severely shaken these past few weeks; also my choice to utilize terrorism as a metaphor for family dynamics (my two main characters are sisters). This is not to say that terrorism, due to its new immediacy, is beyond the reach of metaphor; it is simply to say that the book I will write now, versus the book I might have written, will necessarily be the product of a very different mindset.”
"Once the trade towers were attacked, I had to decide, 'did this book take place before or after?' It changed everything.”
In the days following September 11th, Julavits had a difficult time deciding whether or not to finish her novel that was about terrorism. She had to make some adjustments in her book and she made a bold statement by having it published after one of America’s most disastrous events. Julavits waited many months and finished The Effect of Living Backwards at the end of the summer of 2001.
Work Cited
"Believe! Heidi Julavits Has Emerged from Her Tennis-Ball Canister!" Powells. 16 April 2007. http://www.powells.com/authors/julavits.html.
Benson, Heidi. "Funny things happen when a hijacking occurs in young writer Heidi Julavits' second novel". San Francisco Chronicle. 5 July 2003. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/07/05/DD245371.DTL
Birnbaum, Robert. "Heidi Julavits". The Morning News. 10 January 2007. http://www.themorningnews.org/archives/birnbaum_v/heidi_julavits.php.
"Heidi Julavits Biography". Encyclopedia of World Biography . 2007. http://www.notablebiographies.com/newsmakers2/2007-Co-Lh/Julavits-Heidi.html
Julavits, Heidi. "Hotel Andromeda". Artspace Books. Hong Kong, 2003.
Maclaughlin, Nina. "The uses of Heidi Julavits". The Phoneix. 15 November 2006. http://thephoenix.com/Boston/Arts/27467-uses-of-Heidi-Julavits/
"The Effect of Living Backwards: Editorial Review". Amazon.com. 2008. http://www.amazon.com/Effect-Living-Backwards-Heidi-Julavits/dp/product-description/0425198170